• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day should be treated as a bad sign. Any serious team will come back with questions first: about integrations. A supplier that prices before understanding the scope is pricing a guess, and a guess will be corrected later — and you will pay for it.

Watch for any distance between the team in the pitch and the hire developers in germany actually assigned. Ask for specific people rather than roles in the statement of work, with wording covering replacement. A provider that only offers roles and never names individuals is reserving its own flexibility at your cost.

Require access to the repository from the start. A team that hands over code only at milestones is asking you to trust a black box. Daily commits show you how many people are really working far better than any status report. This extends to the build and deployment setup: if there is no pipeline, promises about quality are nothing more than words.

Loose wording in the contract around IP is rarely an oversight. The agreement must state explicitly that all deliverables belong to your business upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Look too at the governing law and how payments are structured: heavy prepayment with no milestone tied to it eliminates any leverage you would otherwise keep.

Last, ai development company look at communication. Establish what overlap you will share with your timezone, which person answers questions and on what response times. Four hours of overlap is normally sufficient; no overlap stretches a five-minute question into a lost day. Careless writing in the early emails will not improve once the work starts.